Time travel to the past has been an unsolved mystery ever since Einstein's Relativity Theory. The causality effect has been recently discovered unbreakable and new laws have been discovered governing causality. Time Paradoxes seem to vanish in the light of new theories and advances in the science of quanta.
Yet, what still remains unknown is the fact that we are stretching. Indeed, since our universe is expanding, there are great forces acting on us, causing the stretching and expansion of all bodies.
The arrow of time is thus formed, due to the expansion of the Universe, and causality describes phenomena, due exactly to this arrow, this direction.
Now, time travel to the future has been easily described as needing an amount of energy equal to the mass of the body times the velocity of light in vacuum squared.
What has been ignored in the travel to the past is that we must not accelerate to reach that energy, but rather decelerate and detach ourselves from our ever-expanding, and moving outwards universe.
We must thus attain an inertia to our changing world. Do not forget that while time passes, millisecond by millisecond, day by day, our space evolves too, 3-dimensionally. In order to achieve the deceleration foretold, we have to shrink by cooling.
A temperature of 0 oK would be the boundary of "here and now" to "here before". In contemporary units, I would call choro-chronio, the unit 0.00000001s or 10m/ns the unit ratio of space to time fraction that signifies the fabric of space-time.
And I would suppose that the universe is expanding by the speed of light. Now on proportions, only a fraction of that magnitude is actually our changing rate, since the original size of the universe over the new gained size in the next second would be the actual dimension gained. Meaning that if the universe is aged some 6 billion years, say, thus about 6000000000yearsx365daysx24hoursx60minutesx60seconds=200000Ts. During the time of the big bang our universe has expanded by 200000Tsx300000000m=60T2m. which is the current size of the universe. That is a distance of 6 billion light years.
Can the choro-chronio be an estimating indicator of a human's growth rate? Lets examine just that: a newly born baby is actually nine months old. This means that it grows 10m/ns over 9x30x24x60x60x1000000000ns=23,33x109 times bigger than when conceived. While when aged 180 months old (7,5 years old) it is 20 times bigger than birthday. And at age 22 is 60 times bigger than birthday. Which is only 3 times bigger than age 7. at age 30 she is 80 times bigger than birthday and 1.33 times bigger than age 22. At age 38 she is 100 bigger than birthday and 1.25 times bigger than age 30. At age 45 she is 120 times bigger than birthday and 1.2 from previous stage of 38, at 53 she is 140, and 1.7, next stage 160 by 1.14, next aged 68 she is 180 by 1.12 and then 200 by 1.11. lets say she dies at 83 at 220 times bigger than birthday and 1.10 times bigger than previous stage. We assume that death comes when growth rate reaches unity (one) and the system hence starts to deteriorate. A good observation is the fact that after 22 the person seems to have reached a maximum growth. In that case a negative growth can be estimated for future stages reaching a final dying age at a more realistic time. We notice that the rate decreases while ageing at an acceptable and well expected rate. One would assume that this calculation could continue for ever since unity can not be reached, yet when the stages are shrunk to the choro-chronium stage instead of 7.5 year- stages, we reach unity at an expected age. Hint: Make the calculations yourself.
So forget about building a machine that would accelerate to the speed of light, we rather need to decelerate to absolute zero.
We will then enter a negative space-time lying in the 3rd quarter on the axes above. An ideal case would be following simultaneously, the two paths described is the following curves, ending up on the same spot in space but in past time.
Does the path of quanta accelerated to super light speeds showing them split in two have to do with this? Perhaps!
Remember that the heart formed by the two paths of curves symbolizes the "Estavromenos" meaning the Christ on the Cross. So perhaps that is the right path to follow!
Author: Citro Milo