Time travel and the choro-chronio index. How the universe behaves and what are its boundaries

Time travel to the past has been an unsolved mystery ever since Einstein's Relativity Theory. The causality effect has been recently discovered unbreakable and new laws have been discovered governing causality. Time Paradoxes seem to vanish in the light of new theories and advances in the science of quanta.

Yet, what still remains unknown is the fact that we are stretching. Indeed, since our universe is expanding, there are great forces acting on us, causing the stretching and expansion of all bodies.

The arrow of time is thus formed, due to the expansion of the Universe, and causality describes phenomena, due exactly to this arrow, this direction.

Now, time travel to the future has been easily described as needing an amount of energy equal to the mass of the body times the velocity of light in vacuum squared.

What has been ignored in the travel to the past is that we must not accelerate to reach that energy, but rather decelerate and detach ourselves from our ever-expanding, and moving outwards universe.

We must thus attain an inertia to our changing world. Do not forget that while time passes, millisecond by millisecond, day by day, our space evolves too, 3-dimensionally. In order to achieve the deceleration foretold, we have to shrink by cooling.

A temperature of 0 ^oK would be the boundary of "here and now" to "here before". In contemporary units, I would call choro-chronio, the unit 0.00000001s or 10m/ns the unit ratio of space to time fraction that signifies the fabric of space-time.

And I would suppose that the universe is expanding by the speed of light. Now on proportions, only a fraction of that magnitude is actually our changing rate, since the original size of the universe over the new gained size in the next second would be the actual dimension gained. Meaning that if the universe is aged some 6 billion years, say, thus about 6000000000yearsx365daysx24hoursx60minutesx60seconds=200000Ts. During the time of the big bang our universe has expanded by 200000Tsx300000000m=60T²m. which is the current size of the universe. That is a distance of 6 billion light years.

Can the choro-chronio be an estimating indicator of a human's growth rate? Lets examine just that: a newly born baby is actually nine months old. This means that it grows 10m/ns over 9x30x24x60x60x1000000000ns=23,33x10⁹ times bigger than when conceived. While when aged 180 months old (7,5 years old) it is 20 times bigger than birthday. And at age 22 is 60 times bigger than birthday. Which is only 3 times bigger than age 7. at age 30 she is 80 times bigger than birthday and 1.33 times bigger than age 22. At age 38 she is 100 bigger than birthday and 1.25 times bigger than age 30. At age 45 she is 120 times bigger than birthday and 1.2 from previous stage of 38, at 53 she is 140, and 1.7, next stage 160 by 1.14, next aged 68 she is 180 by 1.12 and then 200 by 1.11. lets say she dies at 83 at 220 times bigger than birthday and 1.10 times bigger than previous stage. We assume that death comes when growth rate reaches unity (one) and the system hence starts to deteriorate. A good observation is the fact that after 22 the person seems to have reached a maximum growth. In that case a negative growth can be estimated for future stages reaching a final dying age at a more realistic time. We notice that the rate decreases while ageing at an acceptable and well expected rate. One would assume that this calculation could continue for ever since unity can not be reached, yet when the stages are shrunk to the choro-chronium stage instead of 7.5 year- stages, we reach unity at an expected age. Hint: Make the calculations yourself.

So forget about building a machine that would accelerate to the speed of light, we rather need to decelerate to absolute zero.

We will then enter a negative space-time lying in the 3^rd quarter on the axes above. An ideal case would be following simultaneously, the two paths described is the following curves, ending up on the same spot in space but in past time.

Does the path of quanta accelerated to super light speeds showing them split in two have to do with this? Perhaps!

Remember that the heart formed by the two paths of curves symbolizes the "Estavromenos" meaning the Christ on the Cross. So perhaps that is the right path to follow!

Author: Citro Milo

Untitled

It is generally accepted that matter curves space and time. According to this theory, gravity is explained but the axiom is not proved. Meaning that, it is observable, yes, but still we have no explanation for it? That is, why is matter curving space? What are its qualities that explain its demonstrated behaviour?

What if we consider that matter is curved space? (and time? Lets examine that later). Then an object would be a curvature of space. Then the bending of space time within the gravitational field of the object is natural and needs no further explanation according to this theory.

Further on, the electrical phenomenon can be also explained: For instance, let us consider that a positron, which is positively charged is a curvature of space. Then the electron will be curving space as well. The reason why negative charged travels towards positive could the fact that positive charged particles curve space more that negative charge. Thus the negative charge travels towards the positive?

Now let us consider light: Why is that the when an electron shifts to a lower stack a photon is produced? Why is light behaving as a wave and as a particle? Simply because as a matter occupying particle is curved space? Why not. While as a wave it travels with the speed of light.

According to our choro chronio index, the fabric of time and space is laced by it, a wave, though, which is a photon travelling, is an expanding particle. Expnading at a rate equal to the speed of light.

And since space is relatively expanding at a lower rate, thus we have the particle embracing its surroundings at the speed of light.

Some thoughts.. Citro Milo

Project time: The explanation of all time(s)

The universe is expanding; this is a universally accepted theory. In fact this is not a theory; it is a fact, after all.

When we say the universe is expanding, what we mean is that time and space are expanding. This expansion of space-time, allows us to sense the arrow of time. The reason we do not “see” the expansion of space is because we expand with it.

Gravity resists this “growing”, since matter is attracted to each other, hence we have the bending of space-time around it.
Actually matter can be interpreted as a node of space-time trapped in a curvature so dense that is physically possible to see. The particles composing matter are mini universe-like demonstrations of space-time.

The energy associated with matter, such as nuclear, atomic, electrical, light, mechanical, thermal etc. is nothing but the exchange field currents within the ever-expanding universe. In an instant the universe encapsulates an amount of energy, which is nothing more than its original energy since the end of time. Or is it not?
In fact, there are energy exchanges between instances. Energy, in classical physics, is defined as the ability to produce work (with in a framework of space-time) I would add, while I would state that energy is (in a universal sense) is simply the effect of space-time interaction and entropy is the ability of the universe to exist. Nothing new has been stated so far, and nothing that erases contemporary knowledge.

Yet, in a sense, physical phenomena that involve energy transformations are caused by time travels or space travels from the future or the past. Why?

Because a trip to the future should involve speeds greater than light. And trips to the past should involve condensation to less than absolute zero. Why?

What is light? A new explanation:
Light has been thought of as a wave and material. This is correct. But according to our expansion theory, light travels in space with the speed on the borderline of time travel to the future. Why is light visible? Why does it behave like a wave? The answer to this is because a light source expands more rapidly than the rest of the universe. Hence when we reach it, this has already expanded a bit more, hence we are with in it (fig. 1)


Our center of gravity changes continuously with respect to its previous position and with respect to the rest of the bodies around us. This change is caused by gravitational forces exerted by other bodies in the surrounding environment upon us as they grow in a different rate (speaking about a static universe).

What is momentum? An explanation
Momentum is the effect of a moving body in space-time; No only this. It is the resistance to change because of the fact that the body is changing its centre of gravity. The reason why it is taking up some time and some space to stop a moving object is because its moving centre of resists skips bits of expansion in its motion due to the fact that its relation to the expansion rate of the universe is smaller. This is why motion causes bodies to live less. Because of gravity they maintain their matter and last shorter time, while stationary objects last longer.

In order to travel to the past one must shrink (resist his own expansion into the future) by freezing beyond absolute zero. How can a message be sent to the past? Every condensation from the present causes an explosion in the past. Every explosion caused in present time causes a freezing in the future. Yes there is energy transfer between past and future. This for sure; but does it work backwards? Why not? Cause and effect is a convention; in an entropical sense everything is caused by future factual necessity.
I can take my car right now and drive to a nice hotel to the beach. Why I do not do it is not because I have decided not to, on the contrary I would like to be there, but because past commitments engage me into this activity of writing. Entropically, there is no factual necessity of the future to drive to the beach because there is a more efficient outcome in staying right here and do this writing for you. Had it been vain, I would be struggling against the whole universe. So when we say that once you are determined to do something, the whole universe conspires for you to make it happen, actually this determination is caused by the future necessity of the universe to provoke this change.
What I am saying is that the car is not moving against friction towards its destination but there is a pull on the car from this destination.
There is causal need to go through the certain path and end the trip where it will. The driver is the mediator that sensed this need, one way or another. We just say: he decided to drive that way.

Decision is the outcome of factual need drawn from the future causing action, so we have a cycle: the future causes the need at the present received by the driver who can only resemble the past and that is why he finds cause an effect in it.

The outcome is pulling the cause, becoming the cause itself.

Incomplete, by Citro Milo