Ηλεκτρονικό, και συνεπώς οικολογικό, περιοδικό ποικίλης ύλης. Σκοπός του είναι η αγωγή της ψυχής και του πνεύματος σε όλα τα επίπεδα.
Παρασκευή 24 Ιουλίου 2009
Πέμπτη 9 Ιουλίου 2009
(theory of relativity)
someone i know at work, yesterday complained to me of the different measures teachers use in assessing students, and how this affects the students' grades, some positively and others in a negative way.
noting is absolute. look around. everything is changing. how can anyone expect uniform assessment criteria?
-but where does "isotita" goes?
-aha: by "isotita" do we mean "equity", which i.m.h.o is not such a good thing? or o we mean "equality" which is obviously more desireable? because i am aware of a distinction as such in the greek language , and what you might mean is "exisosi" instead of "isotimia"; and their difference is that the first is based on quantity while the second is based on quality.
therefore, if we want equality in student assessment, we should be aiming at equal opportunities towards it and not diminishing it to equitable methods, standards or ways for teachers to assess.
should we rather not seek to welcome all stakeholders and on an individual basis, produce an ongoing process of defining and re-fining our criteria?
would not this be a rather better approach towards equality?
since everything is relative and nothing is absolute, why should we seek for absolute measures?
the only unchanged should be our positive attitude towards change;
and, on second thought, that should be increasing, too!
noting is absolute. look around. everything is changing. how can anyone expect uniform assessment criteria?
-but where does "isotita" goes?
-aha: by "isotita" do we mean "equity", which i.m.h.o is not such a good thing? or o we mean "equality" which is obviously more desireable? because i am aware of a distinction as such in the greek language , and what you might mean is "exisosi" instead of "isotimia"; and their difference is that the first is based on quantity while the second is based on quality.
therefore, if we want equality in student assessment, we should be aiming at equal opportunities towards it and not diminishing it to equitable methods, standards or ways for teachers to assess.
should we rather not seek to welcome all stakeholders and on an individual basis, produce an ongoing process of defining and re-fining our criteria?
would not this be a rather better approach towards equality?
since everything is relative and nothing is absolute, why should we seek for absolute measures?
the only unchanged should be our positive attitude towards change;
and, on second thought, that should be increasing, too!
Εγγραφή σε:
Αναρτήσεις (Atom)
Η λίστα ιστολογίων μου
-
-
-
-
-
-
Disrupting Education: Holly ClarkΠριν από 8 χρόνια
-
Τζιείνος ο γέρημος ο ΚυπραίοςΠριν από 10 χρόνια
-
Καλοκαίρι 1974, από το ημερολόγιο ενός φοιτητήΠριν από 10 χρόνια
-
-
-
Αυτοκριτική για τον εορτασμό της 28ης ΟκτώβρηΠριν από 11 χρόνια
-
-
-
-
-
Russian translation of the "General" story taken from my bookΠριν από 13 χρόνια
-
Η Ζωή;Πριν από 13 χρόνια
-
ΥΙΟΘΕΤΩΝΤΑΣ ΕΝΑ ΣΚΥΛΑΚΙ Ή ΓΑΤΑΚΙ ....Πριν από 13 χρόνια
-
-
Ενδιαφέρομαι περισσότερο για θέματα που αφορούν:
Followers
Πληροφορίες
- Citro
- Μόρφου, Cyprus
- "What I might regret one day..? could be the bookmarks I have never revisited in my quest to conquer more of the web.." (Aniftos P.)
Αριθμός μοναδικών επισκεπτών μέχρι αυτή τη στιγμή
Archives
-
►
2013
(1)
- ► Αυγούστου 2013 (1)
-
►
2011
(6)
- ► Νοεμβρίου 2011 (2)
- ► Αυγούστου 2011 (1)
- ► Μαΐου 2011 (1)
- ► Ιανουαρίου 2011 (2)
-
►
2010
(10)
- ► Δεκεμβρίου 2010 (1)
- ► Αυγούστου 2010 (1)
- ► Ιουνίου 2010 (2)
- ► Μαΐου 2010 (2)
- ► Απριλίου 2010 (3)
- ► Μαρτίου 2010 (1)
-
▼
2009
(66)
- ► Δεκεμβρίου 2009 (6)
- ► Νοεμβρίου 2009 (1)
- ► Οκτωβρίου 2009 (1)
- ▼ Ιουλίου 2009 (3)
- ► Ιουνίου 2009 (1)
- ► Μαΐου 2009 (2)
- ► Απριλίου 2009 (1)
- ► Μαρτίου 2009 (4)
- ► Φεβρουαρίου 2009 (39)
- ► Ιανουαρίου 2009 (8)